Wasia Gr
Type Locality and Naming
The name Wasia Formation was originally applied to a sandstone unit of Cenomanian age which outcrops in Saudi Arabia (M. Steineke, R.A. Bramkamp and N.J. Sander, 1958). The practise of applying the same name to an expanded section, of variable lithology, ranging in age from Albian to Cenomanian or Turonian, developed informally in the oilfield areas of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, South Iraq and Qatar. It was formalised with the publication by R.M.S. Owen and S.N. Nasr of the description of the Wasia Group. R.M.S. Owen and S.N. Nasr, 1958. The Wasia Group as defined fails to meet the strict requirements of stratigraphic practise (H.V. Dunnington, 1959, 1967).
Synonym:
Reference Section:
Lithology and Thickness
In Qatar the Wasia Gr comprises, in descending order, the Mishrif, Ahmadi, Mauddud and Nahr Umr Formations.
Relationships and Distribution
Lower contact
It is underlain disconformably by the Shu’aiba Fm, of Aptian age. The chronological list of current rock units indicates the next older unit as Mishrif Fm
Upper contact
It is overlain unconformably by the Laffan Fm (Coniacian-Santonian)
Regional extent
In Kuwait and South Iraq this includes all formations occurring between the post-Cenomanian unconformity which defines the top of the Mishrif and Magwa Formations and the unconformity at the top of the Shu’aiba Formation. The equivalent of the Wasia Group so defined has retained formation rank in subsurface sections in Saudi Arabia, rock units defined as formations to the north being assigned member status (R.W. Powers et al., 1966).
The absence of the deeper-water, limestone, Rumaila Formation is the main feature which distinguishes this from the succession found in south-east Iraq. The general similarity is borne out by the fact that three of the above formations have their type localities in south Iraq or Kuwait, while the fourth, Mauddud Formation, first defined in Qatar, is recognized in the area to the north.
The same rock units are recognized in the intervening areas of eastern Saudi Arabia, where they are assigned member status. Qatar differs from much of east Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in the absence of sandstones from the post-Mauddud sequence. This suggests that Qatar was a little more distant from the Arabian Shield during the Cenomanian.
GeoJSON
Fossils
Age
Depositional setting
Additional Information